Aretha Franklin, an unparalleled, unprecedented icon and known as the Queen of Soul, passed away on Thursday, August 16, 2018 from advanced pancreatic cancer. She left behind family members, friends, and generations of admirers who will be forever touched by her presence.

As the world mourns the loss of Ms. Franklin, another important discussion has come to light. According to reports referencing recently acquired court documents, it has been revealed that Aretha Franklin did not leave a will behind at the time of her passing.

What will happen to her estate?

When a person dies intestate (without a will, or, without a valid will), State law dictates the administration of the deceased’s estate. Assets are distributed to heirs through a probate court in accordance with intestate law.

Because Aretha Franklin has surviving children and had no spouse at the time of her death, Michigan intestate succession law orders the inheritance to be split equally between her children (four sons).

Intestate succession laws vary from state to state

One widely agreed-upon implication, however, is that dying intestate complicates the administration of one’s estate. In many cases, it may raise disputes among family members and loved ones who disagree with intestate law procedure.

When someone dies intestate, the executor, who is usually named in the will, is appointed by the court. The executor (also called a personal representative) is tasked with overseeing and managing the administration of the estate. This also includes ensuring that estate taxes and debts are paid.

In Aretha Franklin’s case, her surviving sons have come to an agreement to assign executor responsibility to Ms. Franklin’s niece, Sabrina Owens. With an estimated net worth of $80 million (Source: BusinessInsider.com), there is liable to be contention about what happens with these assets, but the prompt and mutual agreement displayed by Ms. Franklin’s family is a positive sign that they are working toward a peaceful resolution.

In the case of Prince, who died in April of 2016, the distribution of his estate has yet to be resolved. Like Ms. Franklin, Prince died without a will and did not leave documentation of what he wanted to be done with his estate.

The administration of Prince’s estate has seen numerous complications, from beneficiaries disagreeing with the court-appointed executor, Comerica Bank and Trust, to an ongoing delay in assessing the value of Prince’s estate, which is required before his heirs can receive their share of the estate. Additionally, the fees collected by lawyers, the IRS, and the executor have greatly decreased the amount that will ultimately be split among Prince’s heirs.

How to Avoid Dying Intestate

The passing of Aretha Franklin is a reminder that estate planning is crucial to providing yourself and your loved ones with peace of mind in the event of your death or incapacitation. Whether you leave behind a spouse, a family, or have no heirs, having a succession plan is essential.

Information in this article is provided for educational purposes only and not intended to constitute legal advice. Please consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for help with your specific situation.

Having your documents prepared by an attorney experienced in Maryland estate planning will provide you with the guidance and reassurance you need to plan ahead. If you would like assistance with estate planning in Maryland or have questions regarding your situation, contact the Law Offices of Elsa W. Smith, LLC today.

 

A business may be operated under one of several available business structures. Choosing the right structure for your company is one of the most important decisions you will make because it impacts how the entity is taxed, an owner’s personal exposure to liability and the ability to raise investment capital or loans. It also affects the level of government oversight along with reporting and paperwork requirements. Maryland state law defines and regulates each type of business model making it important that the business know and understand the legal rules that apply.

The four most popular business structures in Maryland and nationwide are the Sole Proprietorship, General Partnership, Limited Liability Company (LLC) and the Corporation. There are other structures that are also available. Because the business must comply with governmental requirements, organizational imperatives and tax procedures, the best place for a new or growing company to evaluate and select its best business model is at the office of an experienced business law attorney.

 

THE SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP

Sole Proprietorship

The simplest and most common form of business structure is the sole proprietorship.  This comprises one individual in business as the sole owner. There is no legal separation between the owner and the business, meaning that the proprietor is the business for legal purposes. A sole proprietor enjoys total control over the management, development, marketing, and daily functioning of the business. This model offers ease of operation, few regulations, less reporting, and an easy method of taxation.

With all of that apparent business simplicity, one might question why a small business owner would not choose to operate under a proprietorship. The answer is that there are critical disadvantages, including that the owner is personally liable for business debts. This means that the owner’s personal assets may be attached and seized to satisfy business debts that are reduced to a judgment. Notably, this applies to all kinds of debts including personal injury or wrongful death awards, which can sometimes be huge. It is also difficult for the sole proprietorship to grow because investors will generally not consider this structure for assistance.


THE PARTNERSHIP

Partnership

A General Partnership consists of two or more persons operating a business together for profit. Each partner contributes money, expertise, working labor, or a combination thereof, to the company. Each partner shares in the profits, losses, and business debts according to his or her percentage of ownership.   Partnerships are easy to form, they do not require many formalities, and there is generally simple taxation. Their informality makes this a viable choice in some cases where the partners want to first see whether the business concept will be successful.

The biggest drawback is that the partners are not given limited liability. Maryland, however, provides partnership models that do provide limited liability. The Limited Partnership (LP) is a more complex structure that usually has one general partner and several limited partners. The general partner has unlimited liability, whereas the limited partners risk only up to the amount of their investment. Limited partners do not usually join in the company’s management.

Maryland also provides for a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), which provides limited liability to all of the partners. This structure is available for professional practices, such as lawyers, accountants and doctors who practice together.


THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (LLC)

An LLC combines features of both a partnership and a corporation.  Unlike the sole proprietorship or the general partnership, the owner of an interest in an LLC, called a member, enjoys limited liability and is protected personally from the debts of the business. Additionally, the LLC offers “pass-through” taxation, fewer regulations and broad flexibility.  The LLC, which has become popular in recent years, is governed by an operating agreement.

Flexibility of an LLC includes optional forms of taxation, various management models, and creation of hybrids that mix qualities of different business structures together. For example, the operating agreement can specify that the business will be run by a manager or it may be set up as a member-run organization.  The LLC is disadvantaged in that it is not suitable for raising large amounts of venture capital or attracting investors for a public offering.


THE CORPORATION

A corporation is owned by the shareholders, operated by the board of directors, and managed by the officers. It must have meetings and must follow strict procedures for taking corporate action. A corporation’s stock shares may be sold to the public if all of the considerable legal hurdles are satisfied. Most corporations, however, are privately owned.  These smaller private companies usually have a shareholder agreement restricting share transfers to outsiders.

A corporation exists perpetually and enjoys limited liability for its shareholders. A smaller business can elect a special “S” status which simplifies taxation. Also, Maryland law provides for a “close corporation,” which is designed for smaller companies limited to a certain number of shareholders. This model has reduced formalities and may be set up without a board of directors. Maryland also allows certain non-stock corporations, usually for charitable and non-profit organizations.

A corporation is the choice of large companies that operate nationally and internationally, and that can attract large investors to finance rapid growth and a public offering. A disadvantage is that it suffers from an overabundance of paperwork and government regulations. It is the costliest structure to start and to maintain. The disadvantages, however, are accepted as a cost of business success.

In the final analysis, choosing a business structure here in Maryland is a complex process involving several competing factors. The personalities, aspirations, experiences and goals of the owners may color the ultimate choice of business structure. When a business structure has to be changed, the business attorney will guide you through the process. Sometimes, that is a cost of growing the business, which makes it a pleasant transformation more than an unwanted expense.

Information in this article is provided for educational purposes only and not intended to constitute legal advice. Please consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for help with your specific situation.

For guidance in selecting the appropriate structure for your business, contact Maryland  business law attorney Elsa W. Smith at the Law Offices of Elsa W. Smith, LLC.  We have two offices to serve you – Annapolis (410) 995-7719 and Laurel (301) 358-4340.  You can also contact us through this website.

 

Los dueños de negocios en Maryland pueden beneficiarse de las estrategias de planificación de sucesión, tanto a nivel personal como comercial. Esto puede incluir el uso de un acuerdo de compraventa, que puede ser una herramienta importante para un propietario de un interés en una pequeña empresa familiar estrechamente celebrada. El negocio puede organizarse como una sociedad, una LLC o una pequeña corporación. El acuerdo de compraventa puede estipular procedimientos de sucesión de negocios, restricciones a la transferencia de acciones o acciones comerciales, y la compra de la participación de un propietario o socio que se retire. Específicamente, puede aplicarse cuando un accionista, miembro o socio se jubila, muere, queda incapacitado, permanentemente incapacitado o por otras salidas inesperadas. Este artículo se centra en gran medida en el acuerdo de compraventa en el contexto de planificación patrimonial para facilitar las metas del individuo para la dirección del negocio y para la compensación de sus beneficiarios después del fallecimiento.

Los importantes beneficios del acuerdo de compraventa:

El acuerdo de compraventa ofrece varios beneficios importantes, que pueden incluir:

  • Evitar que los socios, miembros o accionistas que retiran vendan su parte a un tercero sin antes ofrecerla a la corporación o a los propietarios o socios restantes;
  • Proporcionar fondos y establecer los términos y condiciones para la compra o venta de una participación del propietario discapacitado, fallecido, incapacitado, retirado o retirado del negocio;
  • Proporcionar una fórmula que pueda ser ventajosa desde el punto de vista tributario para las partes al llegar al valor razonable y al precio de la acción que se transfiere;
  • Otorgar garantías contractuales obligatorias a cada propietario o parte interesada de que nada afectará precipitadamente la participación de uno en el negocio, excepto mediante el estricto cumplimiento de los términos claramente establecidos en el acuerdo.

 

El acuerdo de compraventa y planificación patrimonial:

Para fines de planificación patrimonial, el acuerdo de compra-venta ayuda a minimizar el estrés y la incertidumbre para los beneficiarios. Esto puede ocurrir cuando no hay un plan y / o fondos insuficientes para pasar el interés comercial del fallecido a los beneficiarios. Por ejemplo, uno de los cofundadores de una empresa familiar puede desear que el negocio se mantenga dentro de la familia y no se venda a terceros cuando muera. También quiere que los otros propietarios compren su parte para que sus beneficiarios puedan heredar el valor total de su parte.

El acuerdo de compraventa suele otorgar a los dueños de negocios que sobreviven el “derecho de tanteo” a comprar la parte del fallecido. Esto mantiene el negocio en el círculo familiar estrechamente mantenido y tiende a asegurar que los valores y tradiciones que hicieron que el negocio sea un éxito perdurarán.

El seguro de vida facilita la compra de la parte del difunto:

Los activos líquidos o en efectivo que fluyen libremente no siempre están disponibles para comprar un interés valioso en un negocio exitoso de larga data. De hecho, el acuerdo estipulará que la participación del difunto se ofrece en el mercado si la corporación o los accionistas o socios supervivientes no pueden completar la transacción. Pero la planificación previa a través del acuerdo de compraventa elimina esa incertidumbre y establece un mecanismo automático para financiar la compra del interés de propiedad del difunto.

Esto se logra a través del seguro de vida, que se puede comprar como un grupo de pólizas que cubre a cada uno de los propietarios o socios para las diversas contingencias, incluida la muerte. El precio de compra de la parte del fallecido se calcula mediante la fórmula contenida en el acuerdo, que se diseñó para proporcionar el máximo ahorro de impuestos a las partes. La cobertura del seguro está precalculada para pagar el valor de la parte del difunto y los gastos relacionados con la transferencia. La revisión periódica de la fórmula y el financiamiento del seguro es necesaria para evitar financiación insuficiente.

Uso de un testamento o fideicomiso en vida para distribuir los ingresos del negocio y otros activos:

La última voluntad y el testamento del propietario de la empresa suelen ser la pieza central del plan de sucesión. Proporciona la disposición de la parte del propietario con referencia al acuerdo de compra y venta. Alternativamente, las circunstancias y preferencias personales ocasionalmente pueden requerir el uso de un instrumento de fideicomiso activo como el mecanismo central para la distribución de activos. En ese caso, el acuerdo se coordinará con el fideicomiso para una transferencia transparente de los ingresos a los beneficiarios. Con el fideicomiso, la sucesión puede evitarse, y cualquier activo mínimo encontrado en la sucesión testamentaria puede ser eliminado mediante un “derrame” que obsequiará los activos perdidos al fideicomiso para su disposición final.

El fideicomiso también puede establecer la administración de los activos por parte del fiduciario si el propietario queda discapacitado o incapacitado. También se recomienda un poder separado para cubrir todas las bases en caso de incapacidad. Además, evitar la legalización suele facilitar una distribución más rápida de los ingresos de la compra comercial y los demás activos; los gastos administrativos también pueden reducirse significativamente. No obstante, la decisión de planificación de patrimonio para usar un fideicomiso activo o un testamento es un problema relativamente complejo en Maryland y en otros lugares. Requiere orientación y análisis profesional. La planificación patrimonial, la administración de fideicomisos y las transferencias de intereses comerciales a través de un acuerdo de compraventa no se realizan de manera segura a través de plantillas de Internet. Intentar la auto-maniobra de una red financiera y legal tan intrincada puede causar errores y gastos extraordinarios. El proceso se puede lograr mejor con la aportación combinada del abogado de planificación patrimonial, un planificador financiero calificado y un agente de seguro de vida.

La información de este artículo se ofrece solo con fines educativos y no constituye asesoramiento jurídico. Para obtener ayuda específica, consulte con un abogado autorizado en su jurisdicción.

Para obtener orientación en la elaboración de su contrato de compraventa o cualquier otro documento de planificación patrimonial, comuníquese con la abogada de Maryland Elsa W. Smith en las Oficinas Legales de Elsa W. Smith, LLC. Tenemos dos oficinas para servirle: Annapolis (410) 995-7719 y Laurel (301) 358-4340. También puede contactarnos a través de este sitio web.